Signature for `Counts` and `Probabilities` docstrings has the wrong type parameter order

[kahaaga]

The docstrings show

    Probabilities <: Array{N, <: AbstractFloat}
    Probabilities(counts/probs [, outcomes [, outnames]]) → p

`Probabilities` stores an `N`-dimensional array .... 

This is, at least to me, confusing, because abstract arrays in julia always have the element type as the first type parameter and the dimension as the second type parameter. What's the reason for changing this over, @Datseris?

We should probably also think about whether Probabilities(counts/probs [, outcomes [, outnames]]) → p is a good way to indicate that there are two optional positional arguments here. I'd like to call myself a seasoned Julia user, but I haven't seen this notation before, and not having touched the codebase for some time, I had to check the source code to see if I'd done anything weird here before understanding what the syntax meant. Is there any (official?) julia style guide with tips on how to convey stuff like this? I'd rather list a few more method lines instead of nesting it with multiple brackets like we do now.

[Datseris]

What's the reason for changing this over, @Datseris?

nothing, it's a typo.

We should probably also think about whether Probabilities(counts/probs [, outcomes [, outnames]]) → p is a good way to indicate that there are two optional positional arguments here.

Unforutnately, this is the used notation. I have seen it many times in Julia Base. Nevertheless, nothing stops us from having two lines.

Probabilities(counts/probs) 
Probabilities(counts/probs, outcomes [, outnames])

which makes thingfs clear

[Datseris]

counts/probs is weird syntax as it is an operation. IT should be counts_or_probs instead.

[kahaaga]

Closed by https://github.com/JuliaDynamics/ComplexityMeasures.jl/pull/382