Better docstrings for probs and counts

[kahaaga]

Fixes the remainder of #370.

• There was no mention of Counts at all in the Probabilities doctoring, so the probs_or_counts argument in the docstring wasn't really making much sense. Therefore, I split the constructor signature up into two lines, and explicitly reference Counts.
• Clarified that when inputting Counts without specifying outcomes, then the outcomes are inherited from Counts.
• Slight rewording and a few extra words to make it explicit what "probabilities correspond to outcomes that describe axes" mean.
• Added a few short examples of constructing a Probabilities (show, don't tell). This point can be omitted, but I find it useful.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (80202b9) 88.68% compared to head (62da385) 88.68%.

:exclamation: Current head 62da385 differs from pull request most recent head 3b445a4. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3b445a4 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #382 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 88.68% 88.68% ======================================= Files 80 80 Lines 2359 2359 ======================================= Hits 2092 2092 Misses 267 267 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.