Closed non-Jedi closed 4 years ago
Merging #11 into master will decrease coverage by
2.55%
. The diff coverage is59.09%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #11 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 100% 97.44% -2.56%
==========================================
Files 7 7
Lines 334 352 +18
==========================================
+ Hits 334 343 +9
- Misses 0 9 +9
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/Simulate.jl | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/logger.jl | 79.06% <59.09%> (-20.94%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 530b4ed...02f38c9. Read the comment docs.
my idea was to remove logging.jl altogether since in all my experiments/examples I didn't use it but realized logging otherwise.
Is it worth to keep or rewrite logging.jl
? What do you think?
I think getting rid of the logging portion is a grand idea. Would also solve #12.
So I merge now and then we remove the logging.jl
in the next step to solve #12 .
DataFrames is a heavyweight package. Implementing a simple Tables.jl-compatible type allows users to still get a DataFrame by calling DataFrame(logger) without carrying the dependency on DataFrames itself.