Closed lostella closed 2 years ago
Allocations went down in benchmarks, as expected. However, there is a strange increase in allocations for DRLS, so I'll need to look deeper into it. Time increases are probably just noise.
ID time ratio memory ratio
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– ––––––––––– ––––––––––––
["Lasso medium (Float64)", "DRLS"] 1.01 (5%) 0.78 (1%) ✅
["Lasso medium (Float64)", "PANOC"] 1.02 (5%) 0.28 (1%) ✅
["Lasso medium (Float64)", "PANOCplus"] 0.99 (5%) 0.61 (1%) ✅
["Lasso medium (Float64)", "ZeroFPR"] 0.99 (5%) 0.36 (1%) ✅
["Lasso small (Float64)", "DRLS"] 0.98 (5%) 0.76 (1%) ✅
["Lasso small (Float64)", "PANOC"] 0.95 (5%) 0.31 (1%) ✅
["Lasso small (Float64)", "PANOCplus"] 0.97 (5%) 0.64 (1%) ✅
["Lasso small (Float64)", "ZeroFPR"] 0.97 (5%) 0.40 (1%) ✅
["Lasso tiny (Float64)", "AFBA-2"] 1.08 (5%) ❌ 1.00 (1%)
["Lasso tiny (Float64)", "DRLS"] 1.08 (5%) ❌ 1.03 (1%) ❌
["Lasso tiny (Float64)", "PANOC"] 0.91 (5%) ✅ 0.44 (1%) ✅
["Lasso tiny (Float64)", "PANOCplus"] 0.92 (5%) ✅ 0.65 (1%) ✅
["Lasso tiny (Float64)", "ZeroFPR"] 0.94 (5%) ✅ 0.59 (1%) ✅
@aldma could you please confirm the changes in PANOCplus are OK?
Codecov Report
96.25% <100.00%> (+0.47%)
97.82% <100.00%> (+0.12%)
93.82% <100.00%> (+0.32%)
94.36% <100.00%> (+0.42%)
Continue to review full report at Codecov.