Closed ChrisRackauckas closed 1 year ago
Ah interesting. Until now we've required packages to maintain their own adaptors, but with something as fundamental as StaticArrays, and the ability to have extension packages, I guess we could consider maintaining a couple of those here.
Base: 83.58% // Head: 82.85% // Decreases project coverage by -0.73%
:warning:
Coverage data is based on head (
fd54b35
) compared to base (3d592b4
). Patch coverage: 66.66% of modified lines in pull request are covered.
:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
So does that mean it will merge? Or that I should open this at StaticArrays?
No this should be fine to merge here.
Uses package extensions so that it does not add the dependency. Is setup for backwards compatibility to pre-1.9 versions.
Should follow up with https://github.com/JuliaArrays/ArrayInterface.jl/pull/380