Closed juliohm closed 11 months ago
Similar to Shapefiles.jl it would be more user-friendly. Currently we have to read the file with Base.read and then read it again with GeoJSON.read.
Good idea. Feel free to PR or I will add it next week.
Looks like we'll be getting this for free in https://github.com/quinnj/JSON3.jl/pull/243, making GeoJSON.read also work for paths.
GeoJSON.read
Similar to Shapefiles.jl it would be more user-friendly. Currently we have to read the file with Base.read and then read it again with GeoJSON.read.