Closed garborg closed 7 years ago
I've begun some work on it, in GeoInterface.jl, and provided functions to convert them to Compose objects (here). Eventually these stuff should probably be under the care of JuliaGeometry?
cc @skariel
@yeesian Awesome. Sounds right that eventually it should belong to JuliaGeometry if feasible.
Is this issue still desired/relevant?
I don't think so. We've been leaving it to the user to define their own conversion methods, with no immediate plans at anything more general.
Sounds good. Personally I think Geodesy.jl should be about, well, geodesy! As far as I can tell, geometric primitives for making maps are a rather different concern.
This would mean looking into changes to
Base.Graphics
types and methods such thatWinston.jl
could keep using them,Compose.jl
could start using them, and we could use them here.