Closed 0joshuaolson1 closed 9 years ago
no they can't, for e.g. for incircle in 3D you need to calculate the sign of a 4*4 matrix, that's a sum of terms each consisting of a multiplication of 4 integers which needs to be done exactly, to maximal precision. The information doesn't fit in a DoubleDouble, maybe in a Double^5... I don't know.
Anyway, because of the algorithm used to track errors, the BigInts are only used when really needed, which usually is a very rare event. So they are really not the bottleneck anymore. When just eliminating such BigInt operations to measure performcance I find obnly maybe 2% improvement overall....
Could DoubleDoubles be a possible intermediate-precision option?