Closed nmoran closed 4 years ago
Merging #112 into master will increase coverage by
0.20%
. The diff coverage is66.66%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #112 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 32.02% 32.22% +0.20%
==========================================
Files 9 9
Lines 509 512 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 163 165 +2
- Misses 346 347 +1
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/plot.jl | 61.62% <66.66%> (+0.18%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1b8c963...20343ab. Read the comment docs.
Thank you! I am not sure if this is exactly the best strategy to solve this issue but as we don't have anything other at the moment, it wont hurt if we merge this for now.
When the spread of points in either dimension is zero, the logic to rescale the location of points places all the points at the same location. This PR has a simple fix for this.
Example to demonstrate the issue