matching code should use standard "weights" format instead of edge dicts

[sbromberger]

ping @mburq - would you have some time to work on this? Basically, LightGraphs has standardized on

distmx::AbstractMatrix = weights(g);

as a weights representation for weight-sensitive functions. (Basically, we pass in something that looks like an AbstractMatrix that defines getindex(u, v) and returns a weight. This allows us to do lazy evaluation of weights, and defaults, and other cool stuff.)

[mburq]

Yes that is nice. I won't have time in the next few weeks, but I can take a pass in February if it's still open. Don't hesitate to ping me again in case I forget.

[matbesancon]

cool! See https://github.com/JuliaGraphs/LightGraphsMatching.jl/issues/2 for the corresponding issue on the new LightGraphsMatching.jl

[matbesancon]

This issue can be closed here

[sbromberger]

Awesome - thanks!