Closed graeme-a-stewart closed 11 months ago
it should be CC-BY-4.0
I think? since the code here are not gonna be library so mostly outside of scope of source code license such as MIT
Also happy with CC-BY-4.0, I only added MIT to my submission because I'd seen it in some other Julia documentation/tutorial content elsewhere.
I suspect the Julia community goes for MIT very much by default, but we agree on CC-BY as better for documentation. Fixed with #3.
technically Julia Discourses posts are CC-BY-NC-SA, so this isn't uncommon
We seem to have a bit of a confusion of licenses flying around here at the moment:
Can we pick one? I would argue that it should be CC-BY-4.0, but I would be ok with MIT as well (it's just that CC-BY-4.0 is a better fit for documentation). GPL seems an odd and unhelpful choice to me for things.
What do others think?
N.B. This is obviously for our things - when we put other people's material here (
/assets
) it's under their license, whatever that is.