Closed davidanthoff closed 7 years ago
+1, if there are no other pending changes it would be great to have a new version. I'm trying to update my packages, and it would be great to remove one more source of noise.
Is this ready to tag or is there still work that needs to be done? e.g. merging #41 ?!
The latest tagged version also doesn't pass tests on Windows. My vote would be to tag now, and then fix #41 later. As far as I can tell there is no decrease in quality from that, but it would fix the deprecation warnings and make the whole julia 0.5 transition smoother.
Looks like this is held up (just for a moment) due to an issue with the tag in LibExpat.
@rsrock Just curious, what is the relation/"issue with the tag in LibExpat"? [G]Zip has nothing to do with XML, and LibExpat neither REQUIREs GZip?!
[ @SimonDanisch is that an answer to me below? No need to answer, since I guess I'm right about no relation.]
Sorry, my bad for putting them together...I'll go fix the tag!
No, they're not linked at all, it's just that Simon submitted both of them to METADATA together, and the PR was held up.
Thanks Simon!
Please tag a version. The latest tagged version shows many deprecation warnings on julia 0.5. Master seems fine. With 0.5 RC0 out, we should get tagged versions to load without deprecation warnings.