Possibly hardware was the author's intention here.
$ ed -s JSON.jl/test/json-samples.jl <<<'222,231p'
{
\"point\":\"new GLatLng(40.211600,-74.695702)\",
\"homeTeam\":\"Hamilton Library\",
\"awayTeam\":\"LUGip HW SIG\",
\"markerImage\":\"images/white.png\",
\"information\": \"Linux users can meet the first Tuesday of the month to work out harward and configuration issues.\",
\"fixture\":\"Tuesday 7pm\",
\"capacity\":\"\",
\"tv\":\"\"
},
$
Accordingly should the second sed command in this shell script be uncommented?
$ cat typos.sh
sed -i "s/exausted/exhausted/g" JSON.jl/src/Parser.jl
# sed -i "s/harward/hardware/g" JSON.jl/test/json-samples.jl
sed -i "s/heterogenous/heterogeneous/g" JSON.jl/bench/micro.jl
sed -i "s/homogenous/homogeneous/g" JSON.jl/bench/micro.jl
sed -i "s/inteface/interface/g" JSON.jl/README.md
sed -i "s/seperate/separate/g" JSON.jl/README.md
$
exhausted heterogeneous homogeneous interface separate
Possibly
hardware
was the author's intention here.Accordingly should the second
sed
command in this shell script be uncommented?