Closed timholy closed 5 years ago
Merging #78 into master will increase coverage by
0.15%
. The diff coverage isn/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #78 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 94.79% 94.94% +0.15%
==========================================
Files 8 8
Lines 692 693 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 656 658 +2
+ Misses 36 35 -1
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/mapwindow.jl | 97.87% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/border.jl | 99.02% <0%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/imfilter.jl | 91.02% <0%> (+0.3%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6e21e4f...832e759. Read the comment docs.
I agree, the second variant is a bit clearer.
Thanks for the quick review, @jw3126!
I was going through some old emails and realized none of us had tagged a release containing #75. But then I tested and found the following deprecation warning a bit opaque:
This PR changes it to
which I think is better. (The line numbers are wrong, but that's true for both of them; the second is arguably more realistic.) It's still not perfect---
Inner{0}((), ())
is more complicated thanInner()
which is what the user typed---but I think it's close enough that people may be able to recognize which argument they should pass as a keyword argument.What do you think, @jw3126? An improvement, or not?