Closed jw3126 closed 5 years ago
Merging #99 into master will increase coverage by
0.32%
. The diff coverage is90.24%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #99 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 81.12% 81.44% +0.32%
==========================================
Files 8 9 +1
Lines 1118 1159 +41
==========================================
+ Hits 907 944 +37
- Misses 211 215 +4
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/ImageFiltering.jl | 80% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/borderarray.jl | 90.24% <90.24%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3438a0c...e85d0bd. Read the comment docs.
Merging #99 into master will increase coverage by
0.3%
. The diff coverage is88.15%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #99 +/- ##
=========================================
+ Coverage 81.12% 81.43% +0.3%
=========================================
Files 8 9 +1
Lines 1118 1174 +56
=========================================
+ Hits 907 956 +49
- Misses 211 218 +7
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/ImageFiltering.jl | 80% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/border.jl | 80.76% <77.77%> (-1.87%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/borderarray.jl | 89.55% <89.55%> (ø) |
|
src/mapwindow.jl | 78.3% <0%> (+0.52%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3438a0c...15187a0. Read the comment docs.
@timholy what do you think about the general design of BorderArray
?
setindex!
since it would be mutating border + inner points simultaneouslypadarray
? Should it stay as is? Should it return a BorderArray
? Should it be removed? Personally I think it could be return a BorderArray
and the current padarray
should be spelled something like full(padarray(...))
instead.This looks superficially awesome, but I haven't had bandwidth recently. Maybe I can review this tomorrow, sorry for the delay.
Once this passes tests, I approve merging. Thanks for this, fantastic work!
@timholy can we tag a new release?
Sorry I didn't notice the question about tagging. Absolutely! There's nothing breaking here, right? So this could be 0.6.1?
I think you should be able tag yourself, if you like. Perhaps give it a try, just so we know whether you are as empowered as you deserve to be.
Yeah, there is no breaking change, at least no intended one :smile:. I will see if I can create a release.
98