codecov[bot]
commented
5 years ago Codecov Report
Merging #30 into master will increase coverage by
<.01%. The diff coverage is100%.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #30 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 99.15% 99.15% +<.01%
==========================================
Files 7 7
Lines 354 356 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 351 353 +2
Misses 3 3| Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| src/core.jl | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
| src/fast_scanning.jl | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
| src/felzenszwalb.jl | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
| src/watershed.jl | 96.29% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
| src/meanshift.jl | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
| src/region_growing.jl | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
| src/region_merging.jl | 91.66% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact),ø = not affected,? = missing dataPowered by Codecov. Last update 884af7c...db7ce9a. Read the comment docs.
I'm in the process of updating https://juliaimages.github.io/latest/ to Julia 1.0, and found these to be important issues to address. Some of the changes presumably reflect
Documenterchanges (e.g., it seems pickier about whitespace), but it was also the occasion to discover some problems with how we decide on the element type of a segment mean. In particular, this type should be consistent with division by an integer, and hence typically floating-point valued (thoughRational{Int}would also work). Some of the doctests at https://juliaimages.github.io/latest/ were givingInexactErrors; this PR should fix those problems.