Closed tejus-gupta closed 5 years ago
Merging #31 into master will decrease coverage by
31.11%
. The diff coverage is52.94%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #31 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 99.15% 68.04% -31.12%
===========================================
Files 7 9 +2
Lines 356 532 +176
===========================================
+ Hits 353 362 +9
- Misses 3 170 +167
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/core.jl | 69.36% <52.94%> (-30.64%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/region_merging.jl | 50% <0%> (-41.67%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/felzenszwalb.jl | 60% <0%> (-40%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/watershed.jl | 63.41% <0%> (-32.89%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/meanshift.jl | 69.23% <0%> (-30.77%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/fast_scanning.jl | 75% <0%> (-25%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/region_growing.jl | 76.92% <0%> (-23.08%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/clustering.jl | 0% <0%> (ø) |
|
src/ImageSegmentation.jl | 0% <0%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7cb2ab4...e4067c2. Read the comment docs.
I have made the requested changes.
I had earlier mistakenly created a new branch im2graph
on this repository and pushed the code here directly. I have deleted this branch now and pushed the code correctly to my fork. I think the branch has been completely deleted from this repository. Can you check this?
Thanks so much! The branches seem fine.
Added a method for constructing region adjacency graph from an image. This RAG can be partitioned by any graph clustering method to segment the image.
I am unsure whether the documentation clearly explains how to use the function. @timholy Can you have a look?