Open JamesWrigley opened 1 month ago
I tracked the test failures down to: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/53326
The workers are loading the builtin version of Distributed from the sysimg while the master is using the development version, and because we changed the definition of the Worker
struct in this PR we get a serialization error when doing a remotecall to another worker because the master and worker are using different types.
I think this should be fixed in Base, made a PR here: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/54571 That should be merged before this one.
Attention: Patch coverage is 94.11765%
with 2 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 78.87%. Comparing base (
6a07d98
) to head (ec8bce0
). Report is 4 commits behind head on master.:exclamation: Current head ec8bce0 differs from pull request most recent head fa9d645
Please upload reports for the commit fa9d645 to get more accurate results.
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
src/cluster.jl | 96.96% | 1 Missing :warning: |
src/managers.jl | 0.00% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Alrighty, after a force push to trigger CI with latest nightly we are back in the green :partying_face: I think this is ready to be merged now.
Will this be compatible to or backported, if necessary, to the next Julia LTS?
I'll leave that for someone more qualified to properly answer, but FWIW if 1.11 is chosen as the next LTS then it'll be possible to upgrade Distributed now that it's an excised stdlib :octopus:
One other thing I noticed is that this should probably be using Threads.@spawn
everywhere instead of @async
, but I'll leave that for another PR.
I believe @jblaschke was going to have a look at it. In the meantime I see the branch is out of date, so I'll rebase it.
@JamesWrigley @jonas-schulze I'll be working on this this week. Just getting back up to speed after long travel...
This is a rebased version of #4, it should be ready to merge. Fixes #73.
(made after discussing with @jpsamaroo)
CC @vchuravy, @vtjnash