Open tfiers opened 1 year ago
Restarting the notebook ("Restart and run all cells") and waiting for the output of the first cell (containing just 1) takes about 10 seconds.[^1]
1
[^1]: This test was ran with Julia 1.9.0-beta3. I re-ran the stopwatch test in 1.9.3, and the time seems to have been reduced to 8.6 seconds.
For comparison, doing the same in a Python notebook takes about 2.7 seconds (i.e. not orders of magnitude off, but still a significant difference).
I wonder what that time is spent on (but don't immediately see how to profile this), and how it could be improved.
In the terminal:
julia> @time using IJulia 0.806597 seconds (293.19 k allocations: 19.490 MiB, 2.50% compilation time)
and Julia itself:
$ time julia -e "print(1)" 1 real 0m0.320s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.000s
Similar issue (but 8 years old and closed, so not resuscitating that):
Info:
versioninfo()
Julia Version 1.9.0-beta3 Commit 24204a7344 (2023-01-18 07:20 UTC) Platform Info: OS: Windows (x86_64-w64-mingw32) CPU: 8 × Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10510U CPU @ 1.80GHz WORD_SIZE: 64 LIBM: libopenlibm LLVM: libLLVM-14.0.6 (ORCJIT, skylake) Threads: 7 on 8 virtual cores Environment: JULIA_EDITOR = code.cmd JULIA_NUM_THREADS = 7
Restarting the notebook ("Restart and run all cells") and waiting for the output of the first cell (containing just
1) takes about 10 seconds.[^1][^1]: This test was ran with Julia 1.9.0-beta3. I re-ran the stopwatch test in 1.9.3, and the time seems to have been reduced to 8.6 seconds.
For comparison, doing the same in a Python notebook takes about 2.7 seconds (i.e. not orders of magnitude off, but still a significant difference).
I wonder what that time is spent on (but don't immediately see how to profile this), and how it could be improved.
In the terminal:
and Julia itself:
Similar issue (but 8 years old and closed, so not resuscitating that):
Info:
versioninfo():