JuliaLang / julia-logo-graphics

official versions of the Julia logo
Other
115 stars 37 forks source link

PDF-X(3) #9

Open tpapp opened 4 years ago

tpapp commented 4 years ago

I am printing a new batch of logos, and while the printer is OK with RGB in SVG, I was told that I would get the most color fidelity in PDF/X (preferably PDF/X-3) using CYMK.

I wonder if we can generate such a file for the logo, either as an asset for this repo or in a release tarball. The intricaties of color management are outside my area of expertise, but if there are tools in Linux to do this I am happy to make a Docker image that automates this.

cormullion commented 4 years ago

I can add a PDFX3 CYMK version. A quick comparison on screen suggests that the blue is (as usual) the main victim of the CYMK conversion:

Screenshot 2020-05-28 at 10 42 08
tpapp commented 4 years ago

Sure, but I would rather have us convert the blue in a standardized way than leaving it to the printer.

exaexa commented 1 year ago

Hi everyone, +1ing this.

Just specifying the actual colorspace for the RGB colors (is it adobe RGB?) would help a lot already. Additionally, the usual CMYK conversion tools suck, so having a method in place to convert it with given colorimetric intent in mind would be super helpful. (E.g., how do I print the nice julia blue on coated paper?)

Also, I'm not a big fan of pantone, but naming the pantone spot colors for the printing would be probably the easiest to do this reliably now.

cormullion commented 1 year ago

Personally, I avoid this stuff as much as possible, and try to avoid using proprietary software like Adobe and Pantone anyway. Last time I got something printed on paper I got the printer guy to do the matching/conversion for me; the professionals know their stuff and don't get paid if they get it wrong... :)

I'm more than happy for anyone experienced in this area to develop precise color specifications, and I wish them good fortune!

exaexa commented 1 year ago

Yeah, certainly not trying to go help adobe in any way, but esp. for communicating precisely with printers this may help a lot.

Anyway, I assume the current colors are sRGB?

cormullion commented 1 year ago

🤷

exaexa commented 1 year ago

Anyway, for anyone searching for CMYK values, these are extracted from the pdfx3 version and print much better than srgb:

red: 0.0392151 0.875 0.832031 0.0627441
blue 0.765625 0.533203 0 0
violet 0.498047 0.662109 0 0
green 0.673828 0.0392151 0.984375 0.121582
StefanKarpinski commented 1 year ago

Anyone want to make a PR to add more printer helpful versions to the repo? I think the stance "for communicating precisely with printers this may help a lot" is the right one. We don't dictate what printing technology people may have to use, we just have to work with it and try to make the best of it.

exaexa commented 1 year ago

To be future-safe I think one pretty good way would be to agree on CIELAB or CIEXYZ colorspace values, and point people to tools like icclu (see http://www.argyllcms.com/ ) that can translate these colorspaces to pretty much any sensible color system out there.

EDIT: liblcms2-utils seems also pretty useful, like transicc. ( https://www.littlecms.com/tags/lcms2/ )