Closed shivin9 closed 7 years ago
I would also add a point on retreiving the stencil, full(A)
, and sparse(A)
. I think that the fact that this also gives you back the high order stencils will be a major selling point to many people who may need to do more complicated BCs but don't want to implement Fornberg to get there.
maybe we can... but that seems more suited to be in the documentation (or a tutorial)
I think it's a big part of the advertisement that it's easy to get the stencils though. It just needs one line or so in here.
I see two comments left, and @dextorious should give a review (if available)
Looks like something is wrong here. If anyone knows how to properly fix it, please submit a PR.
It's a missing bracket in the TeX.
@ararslan fixed.
Where did you fix it? You'll have to submit your changes as a PR here for it to take effect.
cc @ChrisRackauckas @dextorious