Upgrade BLISBLAS.jl

[amontoison]

@carstenbauer I compiled an LP64 version of BLIS with Yggdrasil. With Julia 1.9, we should be able to combine them with LAPACK_jll and LAPACK32_jll.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (b6764e5) to head (db7ad21). Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/BLISBLAS.jl	0.00%	11 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #6 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 91.66% 0.00% -91.67% ========================================== Files 1 1 Lines 12 20 +8 ========================================== - Hits 11 0 -11 - Misses 1 20 +19 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[amontoison]

@carstenbauer I updated this PR because some users wanted to try it in Ipopt.jl. Here are a few key points:

• LBT requires at least Julia 1.9 to work on all platforms.
• BLIS serves only as an alternative to BLAS. Therefore, it must be combined with LAPACK to provide a full alternative to OpenBLAS.
• For many packages compiled with Yggdrasil, we need an LP64 BLAS/LAPACK compiled with 32-bit integers. This PR includes both LP64 and ILP64 versions, enabling functionality similar to MKL.jl or AppleAccelerate.jl.
• OpenBLAS is no longer necessary as we can now utilize LAPACK routines that rely on BLIS.

[carstenbauer]

Haven't reviewed this yet but note that almost all CI runs are failing. Can you address those failures first?

[amontoison]

Haven't reviewed this yet but note that almost all CI runs are failing. Can you address those failures first?

The issues seem related to blis. Since the OpenBLAS backend wasn't cleared, blis symbols were never used. I opened PR #18 to verify it.

It turns out that using BLISBLAS.jl didn't change the default BLAS backend before this PR.