Open mohamed82008 opened 5 years ago
Merging #238 into master will decrease coverage by
0.48%
. The diff coverage is30.76%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #238 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 56.03% 55.54% -0.49%
==========================================
Files 17 17
Lines 1740 1757 +17
==========================================
+ Hits 975 976 +1
- Misses 765 781 +16
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/cg.jl | 52.5% <30.76%> (-12.58%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 91cac26...8c03b4b. Read the comment docs.
I believe this is ready for a first review.
How do you plan to deprecate tol? I think it'd be better to add an abs_tol
and rel_tol
, have tol
default to nothing
and throw a deprecation warning if tol
is actually set.
(I came here because I wanted to use abstol in gmres for a inexact newton method, so I'd love if all methods got this abs/rel_tol separation. Isn't base using abstol and reltol btw?)
I don't mind getting rid of tol
. Not big on the underscore either.
Good. Then I think introducing abstol
and reltol
and deprecating the tol
keyword is the best way forward.
bump
I'm working on introducing keyword arguments abstol
and reltol
in #280 with a proper deprecation of tol
. Once that's settled, this approach to change the return type would be nice to consider next.
This fixes #236. I also allowed passing absolute tolerance as opposed to just a relative one. Since it makes sense for the residual to be <= the tolerance, the absolute tolerance is the one that should be returned in the
CGResult
. And it would be weird if I passtol = ..
tocg
and then I see a different tolerance printed in the result.