codecov[bot]
commented
3 years ago Codecov Report
Merging #96 (af923dd) into master (0292d3f) will decrease coverage by
4.80%. The diff coverage is94.23%.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #96 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.60% 81.79% -4.81%
==========================================
Files 11 11
Lines 724 736 +12
==========================================
- Hits 627 602 -25
- Misses 97 134 +37 | Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| src/matmul.jl | 81.27% <92.59%> (-9.10%) |
:arrow_down: |
| src/complex_matmul.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
| src/funcptrs.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
| src/macrokernels.jl | 89.55% <100.00%> (+1.31%) |
:arrow_up: |
| src/utils.jl | 67.64% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
| src/memory_buffer.jl | 36.84% <0.00%> (-31.58%) |
:arrow_down: |
| src/global_constants.jl | 50.00% <0.00%> (-10.00%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact),ø = not affected,? = missing dataPowered by Codecov. Last update cefc49e...af923dd. Read the comment docs.
I made a threading adjustment that broke things; was fixed with VectorizationBase 0.20.16. I really should get around to setting up BuildKite to automate integration testing, instead of having to manually run tests on all down stream packages to see if things work.
VectorizationBase isn't a pleasant package to write unit tests for on it's own, since much of the code is less "made for humans" and more "made for LoopVectorization", so it's more natural to test via running
@(t)turbocode.