Closed juliohm closed 4 years ago
Merging #129 into master will increase coverage by
1.68%
. The diff coverage is77.27%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #129 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.00% 90.68% +1.68%
==========================================
Files 12 12
Lines 700 687 -13
==========================================
Hits 623 623
+ Misses 77 64 -13
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/LossFunctions.jl | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/supervised/io.jl | 38.70% <0.00%> (+10.13%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/devutils.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/supervised/sparse.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/supervised/supervised.jl | 91.12% <100.00%> (+1.06%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 71041fb...4bd9d95. Read the comment docs.
This PR addresses item (3) of issue #126. It gets rid of the internal
Deriv
andDeriv2
types previously used to define plot recipes. The new plot recipe is simpler and we can plot different traits of the loss by passing a keyword argument:As a side note, the plot recipe is not covered by the current test suite. In my own packages I make use of VisualRegressionTests.jl for testing plot recipes. Would you be ok with adding it here as a test dependency as well?