Closed Dsantra92 closed 2 years ago
Tests and some fixes are left.
Merging #172 (5af4f34) into master (c859843) will increase coverage by
4.10%
. The diff coverage is68.67%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #172 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 33.01% 37.12% +4.10%
==========================================
Files 41 42 +1
Lines 2084 2182 +98
==========================================
+ Hits 688 810 +122
+ Misses 1396 1372 -24
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/datasets/graphs/ogbdataset.jl | 82.36% <68.67%> (+25.09%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/datasets/graphs/polblogs.jl | 84.21% <0.00%> (-5.27%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/datasets/vision/emnist.jl | 5.00% <0.00%> (-5.00%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/datasets/graphs/reddit.jl | 2.12% <0.00%> (-2.13%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/datasets/graphs/tudataset.jl | 1.36% <0.00%> (-1.37%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/datasets/vision/cifar10.jl | 1.20% <0.00%> (-1.21%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/datasets/vision/cifar100.jl | 1.20% <0.00%> (-1.21%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/abstract_datasets.jl | 21.87% <0.00%> (-0.71%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/datasets/graphs/movielens.jl | 0.36% <0.00%> (-0.37%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/MLDatasets.jl | 100.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
... and 4 more |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
The split for heterogeneous datasets with edge-level tasks needs to be addressed. Now that I have had the chance to think about it, I really don't want to change HeteroGraph API.
Can we add a test with the dataset mentioned in https://github.com/JuliaML/MLDatasets.jl/issues/107#issuecomment-1120384637?
The split for heterogeneous datasets with edge-level tasks needs to be addressed.
it can be done in a separate PR if it is too involved
Merge #170 before this
I think we are in a good position to merge this @CarloLucibello
The pr adds support for simple graph link split (#107) as well as support for splits in Heterogeneous OGB Datasets.
Need Fixing before merge: #167