Closed CarloLucibello closed 1 year ago
Merging #125 (531174a) into main (125205b) will decrease coverage by
0.13%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #125 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.75% 88.61% -0.14%
==========================================
Files 13 13
Lines 578 571 -7
==========================================
- Hits 513 506 -7
Misses 65 65
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/utils.jl | 90.40% <100.00%> (-0.51%) |
:arrow_down: |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
Errors due to #119
I think it is better to wait for https://github.com/JuliaML/MLUtils.jl/pull/124 to be merged and then remove the stack
implementation from here
Based on the discussion in #119, it doesn't seem like Base.stack
/Compat.stack
are 1-1 replacements for MLUtils.stack
. I'm mostly concerned about MLUtils.stack(x, 2)
style conflicting with Compat.stack(f, xs)
.
I think it is better to wait for https://github.com/JuliaML/MLUtils.jl/pull/124 to be merged
You mean so we release both changes together? Or is there a connection to Tables.jl that I am missing?
Based on the discussion in https://github.com/JuliaML/MLUtils.jl/issues/119, it doesn't seem like Base.stack/Compat.stack are 1-1 replacements for MLUtils.stack. I'm mostly concerned about MLUtils.stack(x, 2) style conflicting with Compat.stack(f, xs).
MLUtils.stack(x, 2)
was deprecated already with v0.2 in favour of the keyword arg version, so we should be fine in removing it for v0.3.
I think it is better to wait for https://github.com/JuliaML/MLUtils.jl/pull/124 to be merged
You mean so we release both changes together? Or is there a connection to Tables.jl that I am missing?
ops, I mentioned the wrong PR, I meant https://github.com/JuliaDiff/ChainRules.jl/pull/681
This method should also call stack (if it cannot be removed):
Fix #121 and add arrule
for stack.Edit: Remove the
stack
implementation in favor of the one from Base. The change is technically breaking since we don't support anymoredims > N+1
(see https://github.com/JuliaML/MLUtils.jl/issues/119#issuecomment-1229127997)Fix #121 fix #119