Closed eliascarv closed 9 months ago
Merging #226 (97b0228) into master (beb0c2a) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #226 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 93.88% 93.88%
=======================================
Files 40 40
Lines 1259 1259
=======================================
Hits 1182 1182
Misses 77 77
Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/assertions.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/distributions.jl | 91.66% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/tableselection.jl | 90.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/transforms.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/transforms/dropextrema.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/transforms/eigenanalysis.jl | 87.30% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/transforms/functional.jl | 89.79% <ø> (-0.21%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/transforms/logratio.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/transforms/parallel.jl | 95.06% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/transforms/remainder.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
... and 2 more |
Nitpick:
This is better than using @assert
, but it is more idiomatic to throw an ArgumentError
than to throw an AssertionError
.
ArgumentError is for when the user misuses a function right? In the case of the parallel branches we thought that the user can safely create pipelines and that the error will only be encountered at runtime depending on the tables that are inserted.
We can reassess the type of error in the future.
Em ter., 7 de nov. de 2023 11:58, Cameron Bieganek @.***> escreveu:
Nitpick: This is better than using @assert, but it is more idiomatic to throw an ArgumentError than to throw an AssertionError.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/JuliaML/TableTransforms.jl/pull/226#issuecomment-1798777716, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAZQW3L53VI7EHOBIRLKQBLYDJEBJAVCNFSM6AAAAAA673PEKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTOOJYG43TONZRGY . You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: @.***>
Motivation:
@assert
docstring: