Closed mateuszbaran closed 10 months ago
Merging #672 (58c9681) into master (cdf3f6c) will increase coverage by
0.00%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #672 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.40% 99.40%
=======================================
Files 108 108
Lines 10599 10600 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 10536 10537 +1
Misses 63 63
Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
ext/ManifoldsBoundaryValueDiffEqExt.jl | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
This even looks like a relatively easy fix in the end – are we sure the new tests run on v5? And then maybe check why we currently loose a bit of coverage.
Yes, Julia v1.9 tests run on BoundaryValueDiffEq v5 while Julia v1.6 tests run on BoundaryValueDiffEq v4. I just don't feel particularly good about tests running more than an hour :disappointed: .
Coverage loss looks like false positives.
This may resolve the never-ending solving problem on BoundaryValueDiffEq v5. Resolves #664 . Replaces #657 .