codecov[bot]
commented
8 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
0edec16) 96.56% compared to head (ced5c27) 96.56%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #270 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 96.56% 96.56% ======================================= Files 6 6 Lines 785 785 ======================================= Hits 758 758 Misses 27 27 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/JuliaMath/FixedPointNumbers.jl/pull/270?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=JuliaMath) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [src/precompile.jl](https://app.codecov.io/gh/JuliaMath/FixedPointNumbers.jl/pull/270?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=JuliaMath#diff-c3JjL3ByZWNvbXBpbGUuamw=) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | |:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
In Julia 1.11 some work has been done to move standard libraries out of the "sysimage" and also make them upgradable (so they would no longer be strongly tied to the Julia version). The Random stdlib is a bit special in the sense that it commits "type piracy" by overloading the
Base.randfunction for types that it doesn't own. An example of that isrand()which is defined inRandom. While code will still be able to callrand() etc in 1.11 without loadingRandomthere are some performance implications that makes it so it is better to loadRandomup front.