search

JuliaPOMDP / MCVI.jl

Other
5 stars 3 forks source link

Correct reference for MCVI? #15

Closed Shushman closed 4 years ago

codecov[bot] commented 4 years ago

Codecov Report

Merging #15 into master will decrease coverage by 0.79%. The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #15      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.04%   79.25%   -0.80%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines         401      405       +4     
==========================================
  Hits          321      321              
- Misses         80       84       +4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/alphaedge.jl 38.09% <0.00%> (-5.81%) :arrow_down:
src/solver.jl 95.32% <0.00%> (-0.94%) :arrow_down:
src/updater.jl 98.64% <0.00%> (+0.05%) :arrow_up:

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update b5690b9...c37e65e. Read the comment docs.

zsunberg commented 4 years ago

I believe the original 2014 reference is correct. Compared to the 2010 version, it adds support for continuous observations, and is a significantly different algorithm

rejuvyesh commented 4 years ago

Yeah, 2010 version is here in C++.