Closed David96 closed 2 years ago
I think @DrChainsaw 's idea (having an iterator supplying the wait times) is way nicer than this. Depending on what you prefer we can leave this open and I'll update it to that approach as soon as I find time or you can merge it as is and I'll create a new pull request when I get around to implementing it.
I agree that's way nicer, and would be happy to accept a PR that implements it. Depending on how long you think it will take though, I'd be fine to merge this as a stop-gap.
If it doesn't turn out to be unexpectedly difficult I should be able to do so next week.
See #173