Closed sethaxen closed 4 years ago
Merging #106 into master will increase coverage by
0.52%
. The diff coverage is92.85%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #106 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 75.49% 76.01% +0.52%
==========================================
Files 16 16
Lines 453 467 +14
==========================================
+ Hits 342 355 +13
- Misses 111 112 +1
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/StatsMakie.jl | 100% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/recipes/violin.jl | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/recipes/boxplot.jl | 79.71% <100%> (+0.29%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/group/tables.jl | 86.4% <91.66%> (+0.69%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d52f20d...d700999. Read the comment docs.
Great, thanks a lot :)
Thanks a lot for this! I wouldn't worry about the MultiplePlot
issue as that will probably be overhauled soon. I've just left a couple of comments concerning categoric_position
.
I opened https://github.com/JuliaPlots/AbstractPlotting.jl/pull/345 to add the fix for categoric_position
to AbstractPlotting and removed it from this PR.
I'll tag a new AbstractPlotting version after https://github.com/JuliaPlots/AbstractPlotting.jl/pull/346, so you might want to open a compat PR to explicitly require that or above.
This PR adds a new conversion trait
SampleBased
that behaves similarly toPointBased
but does not make points. This supports categorical axes. For now the only plot types deemedSampleBased
areViolin
andBoxPlot
.Some examples:
However, it looks like the information about tick labels is lost when using
MultiplePlot
:The function
categoric_position
is just a placeholder, as a method with a signature like this should be in AbstractPlotting.