Closed KronosTheLate closed 2 years ago
Thanks for pointing this out, I keep getting confused about this myself!
It looks like I allowed Any
on the wrong side in #148 , let me fix this and clear up the docs!
Great! Thank you so much - the feauture is really helpful ^_^
Do you have any thought on my feeling that it would be more logical to have the first item in the pair be the displayed one, and the second to bind to the variable? It is so massivly breaking that it is probably not worth it, but I am curius about your thoughts.
Right! Like you say, it's too breaking to change now, but I also get confused sometimes. I think both make sense
Yhea, there is not a clear answer, and I can see that both make some sense. I guess the best solution then is to make the order really clear in the documentation ^_^
Copy of this discourse post:
The
Select
type allows the user to create down-down menus with the@bind
macro. Awesome feature. The current behaviour isThe docs for
Select
look like this:So in the language of the docs,
"1"
is the key, and"one"
is the value. key=>value is consistent withDict
, and feels right. But it feels to me as the entry visible in the drop-down is the key, used to index to the right value. The key has a name that makes sense, but the value is what you are really interested in. But currently, the opposite is the case.Additionally,
keys
are of type string, butvalues
are of type any. I want variables to have any type, but drop-down entries to have typeString
. The other way around, which is currently the case, makes no sense:Could I be right in saying that the first value, the key of type
String
, should be shown in the drop-down? And that the second value, the value of typeAny
, should be bound to the variable? It makes more sense, and is a lot more powerful.