Closed ranocha closed 3 years ago
Thanks! I’ll merge once the CI tests pass.
Merging #439 (21a8dc8) into master (c29cf98) will decrease coverage by
0.00%
. The diff coverage is50.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #439 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 55.31% 55.30% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 18 19 +1
Lines 1157 1159 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 640 641 +1
- Misses 517 518 +1
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/SymPy.jl | 62.50% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/latexify_recipe.jl | 50.00% <50.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c29cf98...21a8dc8. Read the comment docs.
Thanks again! Let me know if you would like a version bump.
Thank you for taking care of this so quickly! Yes, a new release would be great so that I can use this new feature in my work
Latexify.jl provies a function
latexify
that can be used to convert (nearly) arbitrary Julia variables/expressions/code into LaTeX strings. This can be quite handy in many circumstances, in particular when working with symbolic expressions. While SymPy.jl contains a functionlatex
that can achieve similar things forSym
s,latexify
is more general in the sense that it supports more Julia types.Here, I implemented a simple recipe to allow using
Sym
s in Latexify.jl. I was told to make a PR here instead of providing the compatibility code inside of Latexify.jl in https://github.com/korsbo/Latexify.jl/pull/186.