Bump to 0.6.0

[mkitti]

Should we be bumping to 0.6.0 or 0.6.0.dev?

cc: @MilesCranmer

[MilesCranmer]

Not sure. I don’t think 0.5.8 was actually released yet though.

[mkitti]

Did you want to release a 0.5.8 from before your pull request?

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Base: 87.34% // Head: 87.23% // Decreases project coverage by -0.11% :warning:

Coverage data is based on head (a0f0e64) compared to base (b95e524). Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #511 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 87.34% 87.23% -0.12% ========================================== Files 39 39 Lines 2316 2342 +26 ========================================== + Hits 2023 2043 +20 - Misses 293 299 +6 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/JuliaPy/pyjulia/pull/511?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [src/julia/release.py](https://codecov.io/gh/JuliaPy/pyjulia/pull/511/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None#diff-c3JjL2p1bGlhL3JlbGVhc2UucHk=) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [src/julia/options.py](https://codecov.io/gh/JuliaPy/pyjulia/pull/511/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None#diff-c3JjL2p1bGlhL29wdGlvbnMucHk=) | `92.12% <0.00%> (-4.07%)` | :arrow_down: | | [src/julia/tests/test\_options.py](https://codecov.io/gh/JuliaPy/pyjulia/pull/511/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None#diff-c3JjL2p1bGlhL3Rlc3RzL3Rlc3Rfb3B0aW9ucy5weQ==) | `100.00% <0.00%> (ø)` | | | [src/julia/tests/test\_juliaoptions.py](https://codecov.io/gh/JuliaPy/pyjulia/pull/511/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None#diff-c3JjL2p1bGlhL3Rlc3RzL3Rlc3RfanVsaWFvcHRpb25zLnB5) | `100.00% <0.00%> (ø)` | | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[MilesCranmer]

I think that’s a good idea. What’s the mechanism for doing a release?

[mkitti]

I think that’s a good idea. What’s the mechanism for doing a release?

There seems to be a Github action setup to do that.

[MilesCranmer]

I think we're ready to move to 0.6.0 (or at least, release 0.5.8), so packages can use the fixed optimize={}, threads={} to launch Julia. Want to create a release?

[mkitti]

I will look at the release procedure this evening. The first target is Pypi, then conda-forge.

[mkitti]

I'm going to work on this tomorrow.