The old names were based on the Julia Style Guide recommendation to name methods with "multiple words squashed together". I've come to regard this as a very bad idea. To quote the JuMP style guide, "This convention creates the potential for unnecessary bikeshedding and also forces the user to recall the presence/absence of an underscore, e.g., "was that argument named basename or base_name?". For consistency, always use underscores in variable names and function names to separate words.
initprop→init_proppropstep!→prop_step!reinitprop!→reinit_prop!getcontrolderiv→get_control_derivgetcontrolderivs→get_control_derivsgetcontrols→get_controlsThe old names were based on the Julia Style Guide recommendation to name methods with "multiple words squashed together". I've come to regard this as a very bad idea. To quote the JuMP style guide, "This convention creates the potential for unnecessary bikeshedding and also forces the user to recall the presence/absence of an underscore, e.g., "was that argument named basename or base_name?". For consistency, always use underscores in variable names and function names to separate words.