Closed goerz closed 7 months ago
Attention: 3 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
acb187c
) 88.2% compared to head (9932d73
) 88.4%.:exclamation: Current head 9932d73 differs from pull request most recent head d421db0. Consider uploading reports for the commit d421db0 to get more accurate results
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
src/propagator.jl | 62.5% | 3 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Not sure why this is marked as "closed": it was properly merged into master
in d421db0
In preparation for allowing for ODE solvers via an optional dependency, we now allow (and encourage) passing modules as a propagation
method
.Also, the
method
now must be explicitly specified,:auto
is no longer an option. The heuristics for choosing a propagation methods are brittle, and it's probably a good idea for people to think about which method they should use anyway.With optional dependencies (ODE) being added, automatically choosing a method becomes even weirder.