Closed goretkin closed 7 years ago
What commit of RigidBodyDynamics is this? What is Pkg.status("TypeSortedCollections")
?
oops, somehow I was not on master for RigidBodyDynamics
, sorry!
(anyway)
shell> git --git-dir $(Pkg.dir("RigidBodyDynamics"))/.git rev-parse HEAD
cd58a541cf085b31913e8a22c3206fff0003a751
julia> Pkg.status("TypeSortedCollections")
- TypeSortedCollections 0.1.1 622daf79 (dirty)
It's still a valid issue I think; the latest published version of RigidBodyDynamics doesn't have an upper bound on TypeSortedCollections, but doesn't actually work with the latest published version of TypeSortedCollections.
FTR, version 0.3.0 of RigidBodyDynamics works with version 0.1.0 of TypeSortedCollections. RigidBodyDynamics master currently works with version 0.1.1 of TypeSortedCollections.
same problem running Pkg.test("RigidBodyDynamics") BTW: I deleted the folder, update the cache, did Pkg.rm("RigidBodyDynamics") followed by reinstalling and then running the above.
NB Pkg.status("TypeSortedCollections")
double pendulum: Error During Test Got an exception of type DimensionMismatch outside of a @test DimensionMismatch("Lengths of input collections do not match.") Stacktrace: [1] lengths_match_fail() at /home/rpowell/.julia/v0.6/TypeSortedCollections/src/TypeSortedCollections.jl:113
Passes all tests with 0.3.0+ (Tests are awesome BTW)
I'm unfortunately still waiting for a response to https://github.com/JuliaLang/METADATA.jl/pull/11158. The METADATA maintainers are typically very hesitant to add upper bounds to packages. I might just have to release a new version of RigidBodyDynamics instead.
Tests are awesome BTW
Thank you very much.
By instrumenting
TypeSortedCollections.lengths_match
the failing arguments are:This URDF was not giving me trouble when using a master from two months ago (sorry, I lost the specific tag. I can do a bisect later today).