Open stepholinger opened 1 year ago
Thanks for finding this! I'm leaning towards deprecating process_raw
in favor of applying individual processing functions (detrend, taper, bandpass). I think that leads to more understandable code. I need to update the docs to reflect that...
I agree, that would make sense.
When the process_raw! function is applied to NodalData, the following error is produced:
Applying detrend!, taper! and bandpass! to NodalData works fine, so it may be a simple matter of adding NodalData as an acceptable input type for process_raw!, or defining a new function to specifically handle the NodalData.