There's also some deprecation warnings that can be fixed with the new syntax, but that breaks 0.5 and I'm not sure if you want to drop support for that yet or not.
Coverage remained the same at 94.286% when pulling b25b379ebf3eb8b7e0d390297feca882da9ba9fc on christopher-dG:master into fffc944119257f468f637405a17aa08358bf15ed on andrewcooke:master.
Coverage remained the same at 94.286% when pulling b25b379ebf3eb8b7e0d390297feca882da9ba9fc on christopher-dG:master into fffc944119257f468f637405a17aa08358bf15ed on andrewcooke:master.
There's also some deprecation warnings that can be fixed with the new syntax, but that breaks 0.5 and I'm not sure if you want to drop support for that yet or not.