codecov[bot]
commented
3 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 96.93%. Comparing base (
beaaa36) to head (eadf8e4).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #760 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 96.93% 96.93% ======================================= Files 34 34 Lines 3358 3358 ======================================= Hits 3255 3255 Misses 103 103 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/JuliaStats/MixedModels.jl/pull/760/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=JuliaStats) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [current](https://app.codecov.io/gh/JuliaStats/MixedModels.jl/pull/760/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=JuliaStats) | `96.87% <ø> (+0.05%)` | :arrow_up: | | [minimum](https://app.codecov.io/gh/JuliaStats/MixedModels.jl/pull/760/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=JuliaStats) | `96.83% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=JuliaStats#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
no release necessary
I like the idea of testing another CPU architecture to work as further sanity check on our numerical tolerances.