Closed mbaz closed 9 years ago
I think we use lualatex so that it is easy to support the lua-specific things in the most recent release of Tikz. Why would one prefer to use pdflatex or xelatex instead?
(I was unaware of the new graph layout algorithms in Tikz -- very nice).
I prefer to use xelatex because I've been using it for years and I have a workflow that works. I don't even have luatex installed. My thinking is, if {pdf,xe}latex support can be added easily to tikzpictures, it'd be a useful feature to users like me. But adding support may be harder than I think; for instance, maybe error reporting handling is very different between the engines.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Mykel Kochenderfer < notifications@github.com> wrote:
I think we use lualatex so that it is easy to support the lua-specific things in the most recent release of Tikz. Why would one prefer to use pdflatex or xelatex instead?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/sisl/TikzPictures.jl/issues/7#issuecomment-141742357.
This feature is now implemented in 06e12bc3ed4be42da92763c819a56bcdda8c31c8. You can use tikzCommand("xelatex") or whatever other command you want to use instead of lualatex.
Thanks!
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Mykel Kochenderfer < notifications@github.com> wrote:
This feature is now implemented in 06e12bc https://github.com/sisl/TikzPictures.jl/commit/06e12bc3ed4be42da92763c819a56bcdda8c31c8. You can use tikzCommand("xelatex") or whatever other command you want to use instead of lualatex.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/sisl/TikzPictures.jl/issues/7#issuecomment-149079351.
Would it be difficult to add support for other engines, such as pdflatex or xelatex? I'm thinking that maybe what engine to use could be configured by the user.