@JorgeLuizFranco once #464 is merged, we should still add a custom generator here.
This will require some long overdue code restructuring though, because the GradientBasedGenerator currently doesn't have an input transformer field (see #435). I'll still open this issue here already.
@JorgeLuizFranco once #464 is merged, we should still add a custom generator here.
This will require some long overdue code restructuring though, because the
GradientBasedGeneratorcurrently doesn't have an input transformer field (see #435). I'll still open this issue here already.