Closed sbromberger closed 9 years ago
Looks like we also need #35 in there to get it passing on 0.4
did you confirm that? I was unable to reproduce #35 in 0.4.
That's very weird. Could it be because the version of libgnutls is so old?
As an aside, why are there two (identical?) travis jobs being submitted?
I believe one builds this PR as-is, and one builds this PR after merging it into master
.
All checks passed. I'll go ahead and merge.
Just for posterity's sake, I did a bisect session and discovered that the Base.write()
stuff was because of https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/commit/2af73dd7723c91b0e9fcf5af7662b40c8fb97067
@staticfloat thanks for checking. When was that change made? I see it was authored 29 days ago, but on my 14-day-old build I didn't have a problem.
Edit: ah. https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/commit/ab5c4cfa296037c5b5be42e11dd742ff5060593e was two days ago. That explains why @timholy's stuff started failing at that time.
Awesome detective work. Thanks for chasing that down.
...se
this works
cleanup
possible readall() fix
irb/tempfix plus some other functionality
see, e.g., https://github.com/osstech-jp/openldap/commit/6ad808dc1db41fabf29a80842649f1105782f890
typo in license
removed commented code