Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Agreed... SCORM conformance would be extremely helpful in making content
portable.
Original comment by clafa...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2013 at 4:08
I agree SCORM, or also TinCan, support makes Course Builder more standard.
And it is useful for student activities tracking a reporting in a standard way.
Marco
Original comment by googlean...@nextep.it
on 8 Jul 2013 at 3:01
SCORM will help users,authors teachers to help in porting to their respective
LMS; I am also lookign a good authoring tool for my portal
www.amityopenlearning.com
Original comment by openlear...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2013 at 5:12
I would love to see Scorm and/or TinCan. I have a number of my lessons that
use scorm for my K12 students. I would love to migrate over to Course Builder.
In my opinion a Scorm & TinCan option would really set Course Builder apart
from the pack. Most LMSs that offer Scorm/TinCan charge a pretty hefty price.
While others point users towards Scorm Cloud, which is a great service, but due
to their weird pricing structure is not very conducive for a k12 environment.
Original comment by mrschust...@gmail.com
on 15 Feb 2014 at 11:38
Yes, author content in Course Builder, disseminate to any LMS/course resale
service.
Original comment by jfrabe...@gmail.com
on 8 Oct 2014 at 8:00
Original comment by r...@google.com
on 30 Jan 2015 at 11:54
Original comment by r...@google.com
on 2 Feb 2015 at 11:17
WHEW HOO! Please keep us posted on SCORM... happy to help test.
Original comment by clafa...@gmail.com
on 2 Feb 2015 at 11:19
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
roberto....@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 6:59