search

JunCheng98 / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Glossary entry not needed #16

Open JunCheng98 opened 3 years ago

JunCheng98 commented 3 years ago

Entry for data fields

nus-se-bot commented 3 years ago

Team's Response

The definition of 'data field' is necessary to be included in the glossary even though it has been defined earlier, since the term is mentioned frequently.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

Reason for disagreement: Since the team themselves admitted that the term 'data field' has been defined earlier, there should be no need for this term to be added to the glossary. So it can be regarded as a redundant and hence unnecessary term for this section.

:question: Issue severity

Team chose [severity.VeryLow] Originally [severity.Low]

Reason for disagreement: Adding unnecessary terms to the glossary is considered a DG bug, albeit one with a low severity. However, it seems illogical to label it as a simple cosmetic flaw.