nus-pe-bot
commented
2 years ago Team's Response
According to the module textbook, the benefit can be omitted but need not be.
Furthermore, the function and the benefit are not repeats, because the function part describes the user deleting an event in the schedule list, while the benefit part describes that the user can benefit because he can get rid of an event that he previously added.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue response
Team chose [response.Rejected]
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: In the explanation that the team provided, it still does not provide enough rationale for why the function and the benefit are not repeats. The function part still sounds similar to the benefit part, where the team just rephrased deleting to get rid. So, the benefit part is not obvious in this case, and so that was why I said it should be omitted or rephrased. The phrase previously added also does not add much meaning to the benefit part, since the user must have added the event beforehand, before he or she can delete it. So, the benefit part that the team has provided is essentially just so that I can delete an event, which is not an obvious or accurate benefit, and is also just describing what the function does. An accurate or obvious benefit could have been so that the user can filter out outdated events in the schedule, where it is explicitly stated here how the user is able to benefit from this function.
The benefit shown here is a repeat of the function, and so should either be omitted or rephrased.