Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Sorry, wanted to submit this as an enhancement not a defect...
Original comment by martin.grotzke
on 5 Apr 2010 at 7:18
Original comment by nathan.s...@gmail.com
on 5 Apr 2010 at 7:19
I've checked in the pom.xml file, r93. Thanks!
Original comment by nathan.s...@gmail.com
on 5 Apr 2010 at 7:22
Uuups, I just noticed that the jar did not contain any classes - I missed that
the directory structure does not follow mvn
conventions. Also tests were not executed. This is fixed now, the updated
pom.xml is attached.
Original comment by martin.grotzke
on 5 Apr 2010 at 7:41
Attachments:
Reeeeally fast btw :-)
Original comment by martin.grotzke
on 5 Apr 2010 at 7:41
Updated, r94.
Original comment by nathan.s...@gmail.com
on 5 Apr 2010 at 8:18
Great! Btw, I just learned one can run
$ mvn install -DperformRelease=true
to get source jar and apidocs. Although I prefer buildr this is not too bad.
Original comment by martin.grotzke
on 5 Apr 2010 at 8:28
I looked at Maven 1 a long time ago. The "jelly" XML stuff was garbage. I
looked at
Maven 2 when it was first released. I like some things about it. Having a POM is
great. However, overall it seems too complicated. I don't need an artifact
repository. Give me a directory full of JARs any day! I suppose Maven is better
than
Ant (which is an absolute abomination), but I don't feel compelled to
personally use
it for my projects. I don't mind supporting it for others though (as long as the
level of effort is reasonable).
Original comment by nathan.s...@gmail.com
on 5 Apr 2010 at 8:49
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
martin.grotzke
on 5 Apr 2010 at 7:17Attachments: