Closed rosana-sc7 closed 1 year ago
Hi @rosana-sc7, current code doesn't support evaluating on different datasets. However, you should be able to do this with a small modification on the existing code.
Refer to below part. https://github.com/Jungjee/RawNet/blob/a49fc21942dd3414ac2100f26f5c208379f90adc/python/RawNet3/infererence.py#L61 https://github.com/Jungjee/RawNet/blob/a49fc21942dd3414ac2100f26f5c208379f90adc/python/RawNet3/infererence.py#L107
Note that your evaluation protocol should be in the same format with current VoxCeleb1-O protocol.
Hi!
I'm trying to make an evaluation of your implementation with a different dataset ( therefore with different test_path and test_list). What is the correct way to do so without modifying the default paths in trainSpeakerNet.py? I mean, what the command to evaluate your implementation should look like? Something like this? --> python ./trainSpeakerNet.py --test_path /path_to_test --test_list /path_to_the_list
Sorry for my ignorance, I'm new at programming in python and neural networks. Looking forward to your response, Thank you!